At the centre of the Oscars
Diversity debate lie Ryan Cooglar and Michael B. Jordan, respectfully Creed’s director and star. Despite its “Oscar
worthiness” – by which I mean its serious subject matter, serious performances,
and ultra-super-special serious disposition, Creed hasn’t been nominated for Best Picture. A critic
provocatively hypothesised that this is because Creed’s a film with a black protagonist that isn’t approaching
issues of race with its caps-lock on. Of course every film’s about racial
experience, but enough of my pseudo-intellectual tangents. The director/actor partnership
resurges following their magnificent Fruitvale
Station, incidentally a film very much concerned with the present black reality,
and I’d be quite happy with them just making movies together for the rest of time.
Cooglar uses shaky, proactive framing entwined with more cinematic Steadicam to
generate a sense of murky actuality while maintaining an assured air of confident
elegance. The result is compelling, and
he’s ably aided by Jordan establishing his own quiet classiness with a telluric
performance, not Oscarly bombastic but rather beguilingly exacting and
naturalistic. Same goes for Stallone, an always unfairly derided actor. Di
Caprio can chew all the frozen scenery he wants and win an Oscar, but he can’t
act like this. Maybe Creed’s nost
interesting paradigm is its mutual timelessness and contemporariness. It’s
immutably and pleasurably Rocky in its not-quite-rags-to-riches redemption
narrative, a timely prompt that we’ll always be a sucker for these stories, but
its economic literacy around the financial crash and excellent Cloud jokes,
compounded by Tessa Thompson’s Bianca existing as a FKA Twigs-esque alternative
R&B singer, suggests a context rooted in the of-the-now. Presumably this is
the point; Rocky’s aged and his working class background contrasts with Adonis’s
privilege, which in turn is an interesting inversion of normal race/class models,
and his oldschool dependency alienates him from modern technocracy and ease of
living. Creed’s very overtly about the idea of building your
own family and identity, and while at times it can be didactic it is morally moving,
and thankfully refuses to beat you to death with its “themes” (CC. Trumbo). Creed never goes anywhere you wouldn’t expect – despite passing up
a radical, and in my opinion prosperous, opportunity to do so – but it’s
accomplished and layered, perhaps a fine reminder that good cinema doesn’t have
to be original or dynamic as long as it’s finely tuned. And for the record, the
Oscars are a malodorous irrelevance and a taintedly arbitrary valuation of
film.
Goosebumps
No comments:
Post a Comment